Source:White House
Video:
Transcript:
Good evening from Bagram Air Base. This outpost is more than seven
thousand miles from home, but for over a decade it has been close to our
hearts. Because here, in Afghanistan, more than half a million of our
sons and daughters have sacrificed to protect our country.
Today,
I signed an historic agreement between the United States and
Afghanistan that defines a new kind of relationship between our
countries – a future in which Afghans are responsible for the security
of their nation, and we build an equal partnership between two sovereign
states; a future in which the war ends, and a new chapter begins.
Tonight,
I'd like to speak to you about this transition. But first, let us
remember why we came here. It was here, in Afghanistan, where Osama bin
Laden established a safe-haven for his terrorist organization. It was
here, in Afghanistan, where al Qaeda brought new recruits, trained them,
and plotted acts of terror. It was here, from within these borders,
that al Qaeda launched the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 innocent
men, women and children.
And so, ten years
ago, the United States and our allies went to war to make sure that al
Qaeda could never again use this country to launch attacks against us.
Despite initial success, for a number of reasons, this war has taken
longer than most anticipated. In 2002, bin Laden and his lieutenants
escaped across the border and established safe-havens in Pakistan.
America spent nearly eight years fighting a different war in Iraq. And
al Qaeda's extremist allies within the Taliban have waged a brutal
insurgency.
But over the last three years,
the tide has turned. We broke the Taliban's momentum. We've built strong
Afghan Security Forces. We devastated al Qaeda's leadership, taking out
over 20 of their top 30 leaders. And one year ago, from a base here in
Afghanistan, our troops launched the operation that killed Osama bin
Laden. The goal that I set – to defeat al Qaeda, and deny it a chance to
rebuild – is within reach.
Still, there will
be difficult days ahead. The enormous sacrifices of our men and women
are not over. But tonight, I'd like to tell you how we will complete our
mission and end the war in Afghanistan.
First,
we have begun a transition to Afghan responsibility for security.
Already, nearly half the Afghan people live in places where Afghan
Security Forces are moving into the lead. This month, at a NATO Summit
in Chicago, our coalition will set a goal for Afghan forces to be in the
lead for combat operations across the country next year. International
troops will continue to train, advise and assist the Afghans, and fight
alongside them when needed. But we will shift into a support role as
Afghans step forward.
As we do, our troops
will be coming home. Last year, we removed 10,000 U.S. troops from
Afghanistan. Another 23,000 will leave by the end of the summer. After
that, reductions will continue at a steady pace, with more of our troops
coming home. And as our coalition agreed, by the end of 2014 the
Afghans will be fully responsible for the security of their country.
Second,
we are training Afghan Security Forces to get the job done. Those
forces have surged, and will peak at 352,000 this year. The Afghans will
sustain that level for three years, and then reduce the size of their
military. And in Chicago, we will endorse a proposal to support a strong
and sustainable long-term Afghan force.
Third,
we are building an enduring partnership. The agreement we signed today
sends a clear message to the Afghan people: as you stand up, you will
not stand alone. It establishes the basis of our cooperation over the
next decade, including shared commitments to combat terrorism and
strengthen democratic institutions. It supports Afghan efforts to
advance development and dignity for their people. And it includes Afghan
commitments to transparency and accountability, and to protect the
human rights of all Afghans – men and women, boys and girls.
Within
this framework, we will work with the Afghans to determine what support
they need to accomplish two narrow security missions beyond 2014:
counter-terrorism and continued training. But we will not build
permanent bases in this country, nor will we be patrolling its cities
and mountains. That will be the job of the Afghan people.
Fourth,
we are pursuing a negotiated peace. In coordination with the Afghan
government, my Administration has been in direct discussions with the
Taliban. We have made it clear that they can be a part of this future if
they break with al Qaeda, renounce violence, and abide by Afghan laws.
Many members of the Taliban – from foot soldiers to leaders – have
indicated an interest in reconciliation. A path to peace is now set
before them. Those who refuse to walk it will face strong Afghan
Security Forces, backed by the United States and our allies.
Fifth,
we are building a global consensus to support peace and stability in
South Asia. In Chicago, the international community will express support
for this plan, and for Afghanistan's future. I have made it clear to
Afghanistan's neighbor – Pakistan – that it can and should be an equal
partner in this process in a way that respects Pakistan's sovereignty,
interests, and democratic institutions. In pursuit of a durable peace,
America has no designs beyond an end to al Qaeda safe-havens, and
respect for Afghan sovereignty.
As we move
forward, some people will ask why we need a firm timeline. The answer is
clear: our goal is not to build a country in America's image, or to
eradicate every vestige of the Taliban. These objectives would require
many more years, many more dollars, and many more American lives. Our
goal is to destroy al Qaeda, and we are on a path to do exactly that.
Afghans want to fully assert their sovereignty and build a lasting
peace. That requires a clear timeline to wind down the war.
Others
will ask why we don't leave immediately. That answer is also clear: we
must give Afghanistan the opportunity to stabilize. Otherwise, our gains
could be lost, and al Qaeda could establish itself once more. And as
Commander-in-Chief, I refuse to let that happen.
I
recognize that many Americans are tired of war. As President, nothing
is more wrenching than signing a letter to a family of the fallen, or
looking in the eyes of a child who will grow up without a mother or
father. I will not keep Americans in harm's way a single day longer than
is absolutely required for our national security. But we must finish
the job we started in Afghanistan, and end this war responsibly.
My
fellow Americans, we have traveled through more than a decade under the
dark cloud of war. Yet here, in the pre-dawn darkness of Afghanistan,
we can see the light of a new day on the horizon. The Iraq War is over.
The number of our troops in harm's way has been cut in half, and more
will be coming home soon. We have a clear path to fulfill our mission in
Afghanistan, while delivering justice to al Qaeda.
This
future is only within reach because of our men and women in uniform.
Time and again, they have answered the call to serve in distant and
dangerous places. In an age when so many institutions have come up
short, these Americans stood tall. They met their responsibilities to
one another, and the flag they serve under. I just met with some of
them, and told them that as Commander-in-Chief, I could not be prouder.
In their faces, we see what is best in ourselves and our country.
Our
soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, coast guardsmen and civilians in
Afghanistan have done their duty. Now, we must summon that same sense of
common purpose. We must give our veterans and military families the
support they deserve, and the opportunities they have earned. And we
must redouble our efforts to build a nation worthy of their sacrifice.
As
we emerge from a decade of conflict abroad and economic crisis at home,
it is time to renew America. An America where our children live free
from fear, and have the skills to claim their dreams. A united America
of grit and resilience, where sunlight glistens off soaring new towers
in downtown Manhattan, and we build our future as one people, as one
nation.
Here, in Afghanistan, Americans
answered the call to defend their fellow citizens and uphold human
dignity. Today, we recall the fallen, and those who suffer wounds seen
and unseen. But through dark days we have drawn strength from their
example, and the ideals that have guided our nation and lit the world: a
belief that all people are created equal, and deserve the freedom to
determine their destiny.
That is the light
that guides us still. This time of war began in Afghanistan, and this is
where it will end. With faith in each other and our eyes fixed on the
future, let us finish the work at hand, and forge a just and lasting
peace. May God bless our troops. And may God bless the United States of
America.
Showing posts with label Afghanistan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Afghanistan. Show all posts
Rangina Hamidi: More Troops Mean More Killings
Malali Bashir
-------
Here is a very interesting interview with Rangina Ahmadi, president of Kandahar Treasure, the first women-run business in Kandahar, Afghanistan. She discussed a number of issues related to Afghanistan. These includes; the concept of modern Taliban, sending more troops in Afghanistan, U.S. Afghan vision, corruption in Afghan government, Bringing Taliban to politics, and how/why people turn to Taliban.
-------
Here is a very interesting interview with Rangina Ahmadi, president of Kandahar Treasure, the first women-run business in Kandahar, Afghanistan. She discussed a number of issues related to Afghanistan. These includes; the concept of modern Taliban, sending more troops in Afghanistan, U.S. Afghan vision, corruption in Afghan government, Bringing Taliban to politics, and how/why people turn to Taliban.
Rangina Hamidi is the first woman who is courageous enough to reveal some hidden issues and voice the concern of ordinary people. Salute you, Madam!
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
To see the script of this interview, click here.
______________________________________________________
Pakisan millitary, Taliban, Pashtons
Afghan presidential ellection,
Afghanistan,
Rangina Hamidi,
taliban


Talks Between Afghan Officials and Gulbaddin Hikmatyar
“As the Afghan foreign minister meets his US counterpart in Washington, Al-Jazeera has learnt of secret talks between Taliban-linked mediators and Afghan officials, which could lead to wider nego
tiations between the Afghan government and the Taliban. The deal involves the return to Afghanistan of Gulbadin Hekmatyar, the former prime minister, whose forces fight alongside the Taliban. It involves a complex and delicate round of meetings from the heart of Afghanistan to Dubai, London and Saudi Arabia.” Watch the whole story at the buttom of the page.
I think Taliban, Gulbadin Hikmatyar and all the neglected trouble making groups should be given a chance to participate in political procedures. Hikmatyar’s Hizbe-Islami, one of the dominant Jihadi groups during Afghan-Soviet war, has an immense amount of support among Afghan population. There are no Taliban in Kapisa, Konar, Herat, Farah, Nuristan and Nimroz provinces but these are the Hizbe-Islami fighters who are emerging threat to Afghan, NATO/ISAF and Coalition forces. If Hikmatyar joins the political process it will not only have long term benefits but will put an end to this.
Currently, warlords are majority in Afghan parliament and enjoy brawny power in the government. The questions is if these warlords, who has the same views as Taliban and were the counterparts of Hikmatyar and Mullah Omar-Taliban supreme leader, can be a part of the government why not the Taliban?
An old Afghan proverb says; “Only dialogues (not weapons) solve problems.” I am sure these insurgents will lay down their weapons and join the political process if dealt with care. We have a good experience of having Taliban’s high ranking officials in parliament. They are not sabotaging any democratic process, US agenda or Afghan government. I believe the rest of the Taliban and other factions also deserve a chance for the greater good of our beloved country.
Here is Al-Jazeera's report:

I think Taliban, Gulbadin Hikmatyar and all the neglected trouble making groups should be given a chance to participate in political procedures. Hikmatyar’s Hizbe-Islami, one of the dominant Jihadi groups during Afghan-Soviet war, has an immense amount of support among Afghan population. There are no Taliban in Kapisa, Konar, Herat, Farah, Nuristan and Nimroz provinces but these are the Hizbe-Islami fighters who are emerging threat to Afghan, NATO/ISAF and Coalition forces. If Hikmatyar joins the political process it will not only have long term benefits but will put an end to this.
Currently, warlords are majority in Afghan parliament and enjoy brawny power in the government. The questions is if these warlords, who has the same views as Taliban and were the counterparts of Hikmatyar and Mullah Omar-Taliban supreme leader, can be a part of the government why not the Taliban?
An old Afghan proverb says; “Only dialogues (not weapons) solve problems.” I am sure these insurgents will lay down their weapons and join the political process if dealt with care. We have a good experience of having Taliban’s high ranking officials in parliament. They are not sabotaging any democratic process, US agenda or Afghan government. I believe the rest of the Taliban and other factions also deserve a chance for the greater good of our beloved country.
Here is Al-Jazeera's report:
Pakisan millitary, Taliban, Pashtons
Afghan,
afghan news,
Afghan warlords,
AfghanCorner,
Afghanistan,
Bashir Gwakh,
Gulbaddin Hekmatyar,
Hamid Karzai,
Mulla Omar,
Pashtun,
taliban


Ashraf Ghani: Karzai is not capable of leadership.
___________________________________________________________________________
Dr. Ashraf Ghani, Afghanistan former finance minister in Hamid Karzai's government and a possible presidential candidate for up coming election has criticized Karzai for weak leadership and bad management. American educated, Ghani was one of the first few high educated intellectuals who joined post Taliban government and worked in US backed Karzai cabinet. However, after serving for a couple of years as the minister of finance he resigned.
Many Afghans have gathered in Afghanistan and abroad to ask him run for office and he "seriously considered" the suggestion. Now as Karzai is extremely unpopular among Afghans, he is the most qualified person for the job.
CNN's Fareed Zakaria talks to him and other experts on what could be done to counter terrorism and bring back prosperity to Afghanistan.
Dr. Ashraf Ghani, Afghanistan former finance minister in Hamid Karzai's government and a possible presidential candidate for up coming election has criticized Karzai for weak leadership and bad management. American educated, Ghani was one of the first few high educated intellectuals who joined post Taliban government and worked in US backed Karzai cabinet. However, after serving for a couple of years as the minister of finance he resigned.
Many Afghans have gathered in Afghanistan and abroad to ask him run for office and he "seriously considered" the suggestion. Now as Karzai is extremely unpopular among Afghans, he is the most qualified person for the job.
CNN's Fareed Zakaria talks to him and other experts on what could be done to counter terrorism and bring back prosperity to Afghanistan.
Pakisan millitary, Taliban, Pashtons
Afghan,
afghan news,
Afghanistan,
Ashraf Ghani,
Jalalabad,
Kabul,
kandahar,
Karzai,
Media in Afghanistan,
Nangarhar,
Pashton,
Pashtun,
taliban,
War


Britta Peterson: "Afghans must develop a national vision for their country."

Britta Petersen 42, is the Director of Initiative Free Press (IFP), a non government organization which trains journalists and support freedom of speech. IFP is a partner organization of Mediothek. Mediothek works with journalists, writers, human rights activists, students and teachers to help strengthen civil society structures. I had a little chat with her about Mediotec, IFP and media in Afghanistan.
What does IFP do?
IFP has been doing Media trainings in Afghanistan since 2003 in cooperation with Mediothek. We have been working in Kabul, Jalalabad, Herat, Kunduz, Mazar-e-Sharif and Wardak.
Recently, you have launched a project for journalists on the border of Pakistan and Afghanistan. Tell us about the training of journalists from both sides of Durand line?
We had a workshop on Investigative Journalism in Jalalabad, Nangarhar. 17 journalists from different Pashto speaking provinces of Afghanistan participated and learned about investigative journalism. The workshop ran from 13th to 23th October 2008. Investigative journalism is as necessary as it is a challenge in Afghanistan. Journalists must be able to work professionally if they want to fulfill their duty as watchdogs in a democracy. I believe that we have taken a first step in this direction in Jalalabad.
The workshop was the kick-off event to a program for Pashton journalists from Afghanistan and Pakistan organized jointly by Mediothek Afghanistan and IFP. The aim is to crea

For this purpose, two media centers – one in Jalalabad and one in Peshawar – have been set up. They will host a series of capacity building workshops for journalists throughout 2008 and 2009 as well as regular discussions, round-tables and functions in order to create a bond between the journalists. They also provide facilities such as computers, internet access and a library.
The participants of the first workshop in Jalalabad, who came from the provinces. Nangarhar, Kunar, Laghman, Khost and Kandarhar, will be traveling in December to Peshawar to attend a joint seminar with journalist from the tribal areas in Pakistan on “Peace journalism”. The program will be followed by a “Networking” workshop for the two groups as well as additional 17 journalists from Peshawar.
We hope that our project will lead to the establishment of a Pashtu news agency by 2010. We are optimist that we will find the necessary funding and start working on it.
Are these journalists going to have jobs in Mediothek? What next for them?
We hope that the planned news agency for the Pashtun provinces will be self sufficient financially and thus not dependent on donor money. For that is the only way to create long lasting job opportunities.
Many critics accuse Mediothek for lack of local leadership. I mean many believe that the heads of Mediothek’s local offices do not have healthy relations with local journalists, writers and universities. However, the main objective of Mediothek is to develop communication among intellectuals. What do you say about that?
As a foreigner who does not live in Jalalabad, I hardly have insights into the journalism scene in Nangarhar. I also do not consider it my business to get involved in the problems that Afghans have amongst each other. However, if this is the case, it is very unfortunate and I would really ask all the local journalists to make use of the facilities that are provided by the Mediothek Media Centre. If Afghans cannot settle their conflicts among each other, they will always be exploited by the vested interests of foreign powers.
Some believe there are not many professional trainers in Mediothek offices. For example, a student of Nangarhar University told me that the local instructor of Mediothek’s journalism workshop is not Journalism, media or communication graduate, and did not have enough experience or knowledge to teach journalism workshop. Do you have any specific plans to avoid such complains?
I do not know the trainers of the local workshops. The organization of these workshops has the responsibility of the local Mediothek alone and I do not have any information about the trainers or the content.
We have seen in Afghanistan that many NGOs have not been last for too long in Afghanistan due to lack of funds and other problems. For how long Mediothek is going to be there to serve?
The founder of Mediothek, Mr. A. Sultan Karimi has dedicated his entire life to the reconstruction of Afghanistan. He founded Mediothek already in 1992 when he was in exile in Germany and I do not think that he will ever give up his efforts.
As a media person, what is your opinion about the current Media atmosphere in Afghanistan? Problems,
.jpg)
To start with the positive: Since I first came to Afghanistan in January 2002, Afghan media have made tremendous progress! From almost no media at all, the country now has hundereds of newspapers, TV and radio stations. The young journalists have eagerly participated in all kinds of capacity buildiung offered by international organisations and it really shows in their work. Many jobs have been created in the media sector and journalism today is an attractive career opportunity for young graduates in Afghanistan.
Unfortunately in the last few years, the political conditions for journalists have not improved. On the contrary, as you know, many journalists have been killed, both by Taliban or local commanders who did not like their work. I have enormous respect for these women and men who sacrifized their lives for the free media in Afghanistan and they are the true martyrs. Unfortunately the situation also from the side of the government has worsened as the case of Pervez Khambash shows. The freedom of speech that is granted in the Afghan constitution is not respected and it will take a very long time and much effort in the future to make sure that journalists can keep on reporting the truth about what is going on in this country.
What do you think where Afghanistan is leading? Many believe we do not have a clear direction in future?
The situation is really difficult, for both lack of leadership inside the country and foreign intervention. It needs a totally new generation of politicians to lead Afghanistan into a better future. My hope is on the Youth!
Afghans must develop a national vision for their country based on rationality. The international community must support Afghanistan selflessly and stop playing their own different games.
Pakisan millitary, Taliban, Pashtons
Afghan,
Afghanistan,
Afghans,
Bashir Gwakh,
Britta Peterson,
Human Rights,
IFP,
Jalalabad,
JOurnalism,
Kabul,
Media Trainings,
Medotheck,
Nangarhar,
Pashto,
Pashton,
War


Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)